David Carlson appeals from an order of the District Court 1 dismissing his pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. We have reviewed the record and considered the issues that are properly before us, and we conclude that Carlson’s federal claims were properly dismissed and that the District Court acted within its discretion in declining to exercise Supplemental jurisdiction over the state-law claims. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment, see 8th Cir. R. 47B, and we deny the pending motions to expedite review and to supplement the record.