United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 16-2474 ___________________________

United States of America,

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

Adam Rouillard,

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant. ___________________________

No. 16-2476 ___________________________

United States of America,

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

Adam Rouillard,

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant. ____________

Appeals from United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Sioux City ____________

Submitted: February 3, 2017 Filed: February 8, 2017 [Unpublished] ____________ Before SMITH, ARNOLD, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM.

In these consolidated appeals, Adam Rouillard challenges the sentence the district court1 imposed upon revoking his second term of supervised release. In each case, his counsel has moved for leave to withdraw, and has filed a brief questioning the reasonableness of Rouillard’s revocation sentence. Rouillard has not filed a supplemental brief.

After careful review of the record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in sentencing Rouillard. See United States v. Miller, 557 F.3d 910, 915-18 (8th Cir. 2009) (standard of review); see also United States v. Perkins, 526 F.3d 1107, 1110-11 (8th Cir. 2008) (this court reviews entire sentencing record, not merely district court’s statements at hearing).

Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motions for leave to withdraw, and we affirm the judgment of the district court. ______________________________

1 The Honorable Mark W. Bennett, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa.

-2-