Paul Vigliotti directly appeals the sentence the district court 1 imposed upon revoking his supervised release. His revocation sentence is composed of a ten-month prison term, plus a ten-year term of supervised release, with conditions. His counsel has moved for leave to withdraw, and has filed a brief challenging Vigliotti’s supervised-release term as unduly long. Vigliotti has filed a pro se brief challenging two *546 special conditions of supervised release, and also challenging the length of his supervised-release term.

After care&l review of the record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in imposing Vigliotti’s revocation sentence, including the challenged aspects of the supervised release. See United States v. Asalati, 615 F.3d 1001, 1006-07 (8th Cir. 2010) (standard of review for substantive reasonableness of length of supervision); United States v. Simons, 614 F.3d 475, 478-79 (8th Cir. 2010) (standard of review for imposition of special conditions of supervised release). We affirm the judgment, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.