Elease Hill v. City of El Dorado
Opinion
Elease Hill, Carlton Newsome, and Vada Smith appeal the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in their 42 U.S.C. § 1988 action. Appellants have identified no valid basis for reversal of the rulings they challenge, and we find none. 2 See Malone v. Hinman, 847 F.3d *382 949, 952 (8th Cir. 2017) (de novo review). The judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
1
. The Honorable Susan 0. Hickey, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.
2
. We.have not considered arguments appellants raise for the first time on appeal. See Schaffer v. Beringer, 842 F.3d 585, 592 n.2 (8th Cir. 2016), petition for cert. filed, U.S. Feb. 17, 2017 (No. 16-1262).
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Elease HILL; Carlton Newsome; Vada Smith Plaintiffs-Appellants v. CITY OF EL DORADO, an Incorporated Body Through Mayor Frank Hass in His Official Capacity as Mayor and City Council in Their Individual Official Capacity as the City Council of El Dorado Defendant-Appellee
- Status
- Unpublished