Karen Villa v. Nancy A. Berryhill
Karen Villa v. Nancy A. Berryhill
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 17-1670 ___________________________
Karen Villa
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis ____________
Submitted: September 25, 2017 Filed: September 28, 2017 [Unpublished] ____________
Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM.
Karen Villa appeals the district court’s1 order affirming the denial of disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. Upon de novo review, we find
1 The Honorable Becky R. Thorson, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). no basis, and Villa offers none, for overturning the district court’s determination that substantial evidence supported the denial. See Gann v. Berryhill, 864 F.3d 947, 950- 51 (8th Cir. 2017) (reviewing de novo district court’s decision to affirm denial of disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income; by statute, Commissioner’s findings as to any fact, if supported by substantial evidence, are conclusive). The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________
-2-
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished