Vanessa Dundon v. Kyle Kirchmeier

Appellants appeal the district court’s 1 denial of their motion for a preliminary injunction, wherein they sought an order prohibiting the appellees from-using excessive force in responding to pipeline protests and prayer ceremonies. We have carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, and have ensured that this dispute was not rendered moot by the completion of any portion of the Dakota Access Pipeline in North Dakota. We likewise have thoroughly reviewed the district court’s analysis of the Dataphase factors in its well-reasoned opinion and fínd no abuse of discretion in the court’s denial of injunctive relief. The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B; see also Dataphase Sys., Inc. v. CL Sys., Inc., 640 F.2d 109, 114 (8th Cir. 1981) (setting out factors court must weigh to determine whether to grant or deny a preliminary injunction); Coyne’s & Co., Inc. v. Enesco, LLC, 553 F.3d 1128, 1131 (8th Cir. 2009) (standard of review).