U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, 2017

Clowers v. Crandduck

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Decided August 14, 2017 · Colloton, Kelly, Murphy

695 F. App'x 178

Counsel

Tom Clowers, Pro Se, JaNan A. Davis, Rainwater & Holt, Little Rock, AR, Scott Tidwell, Matthews & Campbell, Rogers, AR, Marshall Dale Evans, The Evans Law Firm, Fayetteville, AR, Delena C. Hurst, Attorney General’s Office, Little Rock, AR, John Lennon Wilkerson, Arkansas Municipal League, North Little Rock, AR, for Defendants-Appellees

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Tom Clowers appeals following the district court’s1 dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, and its denial of his motion to reconsider the dismissal.

Having conducted a thorough review, we conclude that dismissal was proper for the reasons explained by the district court. See Plymouth Cty. v. Merscorp, Inc., 774 F.3d 1155, 1158 (8th Cir. 2014) (grant of motion to dismiss is reviewed de novo). The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

. The Honorable P.K. Holmes, III, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.