United States v. Timothy Jokubeit

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

United States v. Timothy Jokubeit

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 17-2062 ___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Timothy K. Jokubeit

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City ____________

Submitted: March 13, 2018 Filed: March 16, 2018 [Unpublished] ____________

Before GRUENDER, BOWMAN, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM.

Timothy Jokubeit directly appeals the sentence the district court1 imposed after he pled guilty to child pornography offenses, pursuant to a plea agreement containing

1 The Honorable Gary A. Fenner, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. an appeal waiver. His counsel has moved for leave to withdraw, and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), acknowledging the appeal waiver.

We conclude that the appeal waiver is enforceable. See United States v. Scott, 627 F.3d 702, 704 (8th Cir. 2010) (validity and applicability of appeal waiver is reviewed de novo). The record shows that Jokubeit entered into the plea agreement and the appeal waiver knowingly and voluntarily, the arguments on appeal fall within the scope of the waiver, and no miscarriage of justice would result from enforcing the waiver. See United States v. Andis, 333 F.3d 886, 889-92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc). Finally, having independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), we find no non-frivolous issues for appeal outside the scope of the waiver. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we dismiss this appeal. ______________________________

-2-

Reference

Status
Unpublished