United States v. Alvaro Aguilar
United States v. Alvaro Aguilar
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 17-2220 ___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
Alvaro Rodrigo Cuellar Aguilar
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota - St. Paul ____________
Submitted: February 13, 2018 Filed: April 3, 2018 [Unpublished] ____________
Before LOKEN, KELLY, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM.
Alvaro Aguilar directly appeals the within-Guidelines-range sentence the district court1 imposed after he pled guilty to a drug offense, pursuant to a written plea
1 The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota. agreement containing an appeal waiver. His counsel has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing that the appeal waiver is unenforceable, but conceding that there are no non-frivolous arguments for appeal. Counsel has also moved for leave to withdraw.
Upon careful review, we decline to enforce the appeal waiver. See United States v. Boneshirt, 662 F.3d 509, 515-16 (8th Cir. 2011). Having independently reviewed the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), we find no non- frivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we grant counsel leave to withdraw, and we affirm. ______________________________
-2-
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished