Courtney Clark v. Tom Roy
Courtney Clark v. Tom Roy
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 17-1475 ___________________________
Courtney Bernard Clark
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
Commissioner Tom Roy; Officer Nate Drevlow; Dr. Lisa Staber; Dr. Steven Klapmeier; Dr. James Wischer
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis ____________
Submitted: April 25, 2018 Filed: April 30, 2018 [Unpublished] ____________
Before WOLLMAN, LOKEN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM.
Minnesota inmate Courtney Bernard Clark appeals following the district court’s1 adverse judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We find no basis for
1 The Honorable Susan Richard Nelson, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable overturning the district court’s well-reasoned decisions dismissing the claims against some parties, and granting summary judgment to the remaining party. The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.2 ______________________________
Hildy Bowbeer, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota. 2 We decline to consider the new matters Clark raises on appeal, see Stone v. Harry, 364 F.3d 912, 914-15 (8th Cir. 2004), or his challenge to a ruling this court summarily affirmed in his prior interlocutory appeal in this case.
-2-
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished