Courtney Clark v. Tom Roy
Courtney Clark v. Tom Roy
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 17-1475 ___________________________ Courtney Bernard Clark lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Commissioner Tom Roy; Officer Nate Drevlow; Dr. Lisa Staber; Dr. Steven Klapmeier; Dr. James Wischer lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis ____________ Submitted: April 25, 2018 Filed: April 30, 2018 [Unpublished] ____________ Before WOLLMAN, LOKEN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM.
Minnesota inmate Courtney Bernard Clark appeals following the district court’s1 adverse judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We find no basis for
The Honorable Susan Richard Nelson, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable overturning the district court’s well-reasoned decisions dismissing the claims against some parties, and granting summary judgment to the remaining party. The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.2 ______________________________
Hildy Bowbeer, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.
We decline to consider the new matters Clark raises on appeal, see Stone v. Harry, 364 F.3d 912, 914-15 (8th Cir. 2004), or his challenge to a ruling this court summarily affirmed in his prior interlocutory appeal in this case.
-2-
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.