Ellen E. Packenham Stanley v. Commissioner, Social Security

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Ellen E. Packenham Stanley v. Commissioner, Social Security

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 17-2255 ___________________________

Ellen Elizabeth Packenham Stanley,

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant,

Ellen Elizabeth Packenham Stanley, as Representative Payee for M.J.S.,

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff,

v.

Commissioner, Social Security Administration,

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee. ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis ____________

Submitted: April 26, 2018 Filed: May 2, 2018 [Unpublished] ____________

Before WOLLMAN, LOKEN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM.

Ellen Elizabeth Packenham Stanley seeks to appeal the district court’s1 dismissal of her case without prejudice. We dismiss the appeal for lack of appellate jurisdiction, because Stanley’s notice of appeal was not filed within sixty days of the entry of judgment on March 29, 2017. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B)(iii); FTC v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co., 344 U.S. 206, 211-12 (1952); see also Dieser v. Cont’l Cas. Co., 440 F.3d 920, 923 (8th Cir. 2006). ______________________________

1 The Honorable John R. Tunheim, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, adopting in part the report and recommendations of the Honorable Katherine M. Menendez, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.

-2-

Reference

Status
Unpublished