Nathan Hoggard v. Roger Page
Nathan Hoggard v. Roger Page
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 17-2525 ___________________________
Nathan Hoggard
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
Jerry Williams
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff
v.
Roger Page, Individually and as Registered Agent and as Member and Owner of Arabi Cattle Company other Arabi Cattle Company; Jim Franklin, Individually and as Employee of Arabi Cattle Company; Arabi Cattle Company LLC, Limited Liability Company
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Jonesboro ____________
Submitted: April 12, 2018 Filed: May 7, 2018 [Unpublished] ____________
Before COLLOTON, BOWMAN, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM. In this diversity action involving a negligence claim, Nathan Hoggard appeals from the order of the District Court1 granting summary judgment in favor of defendants. After de novo review, we agree with the District Court’s determination that defendants did not owe or assume a duty of care giving rise to liability for the injuries Hoggard sustained during a hay-loading accident. We affirm the judgment. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________
1 The Honorable James M. Moody, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
-2-
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished