Derrick Walker v. Tyson Foods Inc
Derrick Walker v. Tyson Foods Inc
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 17-2280 ___________________________
Derrick Wayne Walker
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Tyson Foods Inc
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Pine Bluff ____________
Submitted: May 9, 2018 Filed: May 24, 2018 [Unpublished] ____________
Before SHEPHERD, KELLY, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM.
Derrick Walker appeals after the district court1 adversely granted a motion to dismiss his complaint as untimely or in the alternative for summary judgment on the
1 The Honorable J. Leon Holmes, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. merits. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we conclude that the district court did not err in its decision. See 42 U.S.C. § 2000e- 5(f)(1) (suit filed under Title VII must be brought within ninety days after receipt of right-to-sue letter from Equal Employment Opportunity Commission); Hill v. John Chezik Imps., 869 F.2d 1122, 1123-24 (8th Cir. 1989) (discussing equitable tolling); see also Torgerson v. City of Rochester, 643 F.3d 1031, 1042 (8th Cir. 2011) (en banc) (standard of review for summary judgment decisions). We also conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Walker appointed counsel. See Phillips v. Jasper Cty. Jail, 437 F.3d 791, 794 (8th Cir. 2006) (standard of review; there is no constitutional or statutory right to appointed counsel in civil cases). Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________
-2-
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished