Victoria Haynes v. Jack Wagoner, III
Victoria Haynes v. Jack Wagoner, III
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 17-2320 ___________________________ Victoria L. Haynes lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Jack Wagoner, III; Wagoner Law Firm, P.A.
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Jonesboro ____________ Submitted: May 30, 2018 Filed: June 4, 2018 [Unpublished] ____________ Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM.
Victoria L. Haynes appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of her diversity legal malpractice action as barred by the applicable statute of limitations. Upon de novo
The Honorable Brian S. Miller, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas. review, see Dittmer Properties, L.P. v. FDIC, 708 F.3d 1011, 1016 (8th Cir. 2013) standard of review for dismissal based on failure to state claim); Sloan v. Motorists Mut. Ins. Co., 368 F.3d 853, 854 (8th Cir. 2004) (standard of review for district court’s application of state law in diversity case), we agree that the action is time- barred. The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________
-2-
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.