Brett McNeal v. University of MN Physicians
Brett McNeal v. University of MN Physicians
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 17-1383 ___________________________
Brett McNeal
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
University of Minnesota Physicians
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis ____________
Submitted: March 13, 2018 Filed: June 28, 2018 [Unpublished] ____________
Before GRUENDER, BEAM, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM.
Brett McNeal appeals after the district court1 adversely granted summary judgment in his employment-discrimination and wrongful-discharge suit against his
1 The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota. former employer, University of Minnesota Physicians. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we conclude that the district court did not err in its decision. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a) (“The court shall grant summary judgment if the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”); Gibson v. Am. Greetings Corp., 670 F.3d 844, 852-53 (8th Cir. 2012) (explaining that we review a grant of summary judgment de novo, viewing all facts in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party). Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________
-2-
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished