Brett McNeal v. University of MN Physicians

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Brett McNeal v. University of MN Physicians

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 17-1383 ___________________________

Brett McNeal

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

University of Minnesota Physicians

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis ____________

Submitted: March 13, 2018 Filed: June 28, 2018 [Unpublished] ____________

Before GRUENDER, BEAM, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM.

Brett McNeal appeals after the district court1 adversely granted summary judgment in his employment-discrimination and wrongful-discharge suit against his

1 The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota. former employer, University of Minnesota Physicians. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we conclude that the district court did not err in its decision. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a) (“The court shall grant summary judgment if the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”); Gibson v. Am. Greetings Corp., 670 F.3d 844, 852-53 (8th Cir. 2012) (explaining that we review a grant of summary judgment de novo, viewing all facts in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party). Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________

-2-

Reference

Status
Unpublished