Corey Rogers v. Steven Brouk

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Corey Rogers v. Steven Brouk

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 17-2912 ___________________________

Corey Jemell Rogers

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

Steven Brouk; John Layton; Donald Hale; John Schneedle; Cindy Griffith; Alan Earls

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis ____________

Submitted: July 6, 2018 Filed: July 17, 2018 [Unpublished] ____________

Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM.

Corey Rogers appeals following the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, in which he raises claims of excessive force, deliberate indifference to his medical needs, and sexual assault.

1 The Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. After careful review of the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we conclude that the district court properly granted summary judgment. See Peterson v. Kopp, 754 F.3d 594, 598 (8th Cir. 2014) (reviewing grant of summary judgment de novo; viewing record in light most favorable to nonmoving party). The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________

-2-

Reference

Status
Unpublished