Sharon Meeks v. Department of Human Services
Sharon Meeks v. Department of Human Services
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 17-2931 ___________________________
Sharon L. Meeks
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Department of Human Services
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock ____________
Submitted: July 19, 2018 Filed: July 24, 2018 [Unpublished] ____________
Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM.
Sharon Meeks appeals from the order of the District Court1 granting summary judgment to her former employer the Arkansas Department of Human Services in her
1 The Honorable Kristine G. Baker, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. Title VII retaliation action. After de novo review, we conclude that the District Court did not err. See Hutton v. Maynard, 812 F.3d 679, 683–84 (8th Cir. 2016) (setting forth the evidence necessary to survive a motion for summary judgment on a Title VII retaliation claim); see also Conolly v. Clark, 457 F.3d 872, 876 (8th Cir. 2006) (“[A] properly supported motion for summary judgment is not defeated by self-serving affidavits.”).
We affirm the judgment of the District Court. ______________________________
-2-
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished