United States v. Gaspar Francisco

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

United States v. Gaspar Francisco

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 17-3703 ___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v.

Gaspar Jose Francisco

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Des Moines ____________

Submitted: July 18, 2018 Filed: July 30, 2018 [Unpublished] ____________

Before LOKEN, COLLOTON, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM.

In this direct criminal appeal, Gaspar Francisco challenges the sentence the district court1 imposed after he pleaded guilty to enticing a minor to engage in sexual

1 The Honorable Rebecca Ebinger, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa. activity. His counsel has moved to withdraw and submitted a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing that the sentence was unreasonable.

After careful review, we conclude that the district court did not impose an unreasonable sentence, as there was no indication that it overlooked a relevant 18 U.S.C. § 3553 factor, or committed a clear error of judgment in weighing relevant factors, see United States v. David, 682 F.3d 1074, 1077 (8th Cir. 2012) (standard of review); United States v. Wohlman, 651 F.3d 878, 887 (8th Cir. 2011); and the sentence was within the Guidelines range, see United States v. Callaway, 762 F.3d 754, 760 (8th Cir. 2014). Having independently reviewed the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and affirm. ______________________________

-2-

Reference

Status
Unpublished