United States v. Augusto Suarez-Garcia
United States v. Augusto Suarez-Garcia
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 18-1272 ___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Augusto Francisco Suarez-Garcia, also known as Francisco Suares-Garcia
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Waterloo ____________
Submitted: July 25, 2018 Filed: July 30, 2018 [Unpublished] ____________
Before LOKEN, COLLOTON, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM.
In this direct criminal appeal, Francisco Suarez-Garcia challenges the sentence the district court1 imposed after he pleaded guilty to unlawfully using an
1 The Honorable Leonard T. Strand, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa. identification document. His counsel has moved to withdraw and submitted a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing that the term of supervised release was substantively unreasonable.
After careful review, we conclude that the district court did not impose an unreasonable sentence, as there was no indication that it overlooked a relevant section 18 U.S.C. § 3553 factor, or committed a clear error of judgment in weighing relevant factors, see United States v. David, 682 F.3d 1074, 1077 (8th Cir. 2012) (standard of review); and the sentence was within the Guidelines range, see United States v. Callaway, 762 F.3d 754, 760 (8th Cir. 2014).
Having independently reviewed the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and affirm. ______________________________
-2-
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished