United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 17-2421 ___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v.

2035, Inc., a corporation

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant

Robert L. Lytle, an individual, doing business as 2035 PMA and QLasers PMA

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ___________________________

No. 17-3813 ___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v.

2035, Inc., a corporation

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant

Robert Larry Lytle, an individual, doing business as 2035 PMA, doing business as QLasers PMA

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________

Appeals from United States District Court for the District of South Dakota - Rapid City ____________

Submitted: August 28, 2018 Filed: August 31, 2018 [Unpublished] ____________

Before LOKEN, KELLY, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM.

Robert Larry Lytle appeals the district court’s1 denial of his multiple postjudgment motions. We conclude that the district court did not err in denying the motions. See Miller v. Baker Implement Co., 439 F.3d 407, 414 (8th Cir. 2006) (appellate court reviews denial of Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e), 60(b) motions for abuse of discretion). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a). ______________________________

1 The Honorable Karen E. Schreier, United States District Judge for the District of South Dakota.

-2-