United States v. Edward Quintero
United States v. Edward Quintero
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 18-1253 ___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Edward Quintero
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City ____________
Submitted: August 27, 2018 Filed: August 31, 2018 [Unpublished] ____________
Before LOKEN, KELLY, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM.
Edward Quintero directly appeals the sentence imposed by the district court1 after he pleaded guilty to a drug offense, pursuant to a plea agreement containing an
1 The Honorable Gary A. Fenner, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. appeal waiver. His counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing that the district court imposed a substantively unreasonable sentence.
We will enforce the appeal waiver in this case because our review of the record demonstrates that Quintero entered into the plea agreement and the appeal waiver knowingly and voluntarily, his challenge to the sentence falls within the scope of the appeal waiver, and no miscarriage of justice would result from enforcing the waiver. See United States v. Scott, 627 F.3d 702, 704 (8th Cir. 2010) (de novo review); United States v. Andis, 333 F.3d 886, 889-92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (discussing enforcement of appeal waivers). Further, we have independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), and have found no nonfrivolous issues for appeal outside the scope of the appeal waiver.
Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw and dismiss this appeal. ______________________________
-2-
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished