Raphael Mendez v. Warden L. LaRiva
Raphael Mendez v. Warden L. LaRiva
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 18-2118 ___________________________
Raphael Mendez
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Warden L. LaRiva; Supervisory Attorney K. Lundy; Unknown Inmate Legal Mail Room Servers
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis ____________
Submitted: October 3, 2018 Filed: October 9, 2018 [Unpublished] ____________
Before KELLY, ERICKSON, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM. Federal civil detainee Raphael Mendez appeals following the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his pro se civil rights action, claiming the district court judge and magistrate were biased against him. After careful review, we conclude that Mendez’s claim of judicial bias lacks merit. See In re Steward, 828 F.3d 672, 682 (8th Cir. 2016) (judges are presumed to be impartial; party seeking disqualification bears substantial burden of proving otherwise). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________
1 The Honorable Ann D. Montgomery, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Becky R. Thorson, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.
-2-
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished