Lorraine Black v. Life Unlimited/Concern Care
Lorraine Black v. Life Unlimited/Concern Care
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 18-1258 ___________________________
Lorraine Black
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Life Unlimited/Concern Care
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee
State of Missouri Department of Mental Health
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City ____________
Submitted: October 9, 2018 Filed: October 17, 2018 [Unpublished] ____________
Before WOLLMAN, GRUENDER, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM. Lorraine Black appeals after the district court1 dismissed her civil rights action, upon the motion of defendant Life Unlimited/Concern Care. Upon careful de novo review, we conclude that the district court did not err in granting defendant’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), see Kelly v. City of Omaha, 813 F.3d 1070, 1075 (8th Cir. 2016) (setting forth the standard of review); see also Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 677-78 (2009) (discussing the pleading standard under Fed. R. Civ. P. 8), and we find no other basis for reversal.
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________
1 The Honorable Dean Whipple, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.
-2-
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished