United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 18-1292 ___________________________

Jamie Gammage

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

Commissioner, Social Security Administration

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Des Moines ____________

Submitted: November 7, 2018 Filed: November 14, 2018 [Unpublished] ____________

Before COLLOTON, BOWMAN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM.

Jamie Gammage appeals from the order of the District Court1 affirming the denial of disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. After

1 The Honorable Robert W. Pratt, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa. de novo review of the record and consideration of Gammage’s arguments for reversal, we conclude that substantial evidence on the record as a whole supports the decision. See Fentress v. Berryhill, 854 F.3d 1016, 1019–20 (8th Cir. 2017) (standard of review). Specifically, the finding by the administrative law judge (ALJ) that Gammage’s subjective complaints were not entirely credible is entitled to deference. See Vester v. Barnhart, 416 F.3d 886, 889 (8th Cir. 2005)(“[W]e defer to the ALJ’s determinations regarding the credibility of witnesses so long as such determinations are supported by good reasons and substantial evidence.”). Further, the ALJ’s determination on Gammage’s residual functional capacity (RFC) is supported by substantial evidence. See Mabry v. Colvin, 815 F.3d 386, 390 (8th Cir. 2016) (“The claimant has the burden to establish his RFC.”); Perkins v. Astrue, 648 F.3d 892, 897 (8th Cir. 2011) (recognizing that a treating physician’s opinion may be discounted and that the record as a whole must be evaluated). We affirm the judgment. ______________________________

-2-