United States v. William Shine
Cases that cite this one
8 later published cases cite this decision.
- United States v. Tracy Parker (8th Cir. 2019)
- Lockett v. United States (District Court, E.D. Missouri 2024)
- Scott v. United States (District Court, E.D. Missouri 2023)
- CAMERON v. United States (District Court, S.D. Indiana 2021)
- United States v. Richard Harris, Jr. (8th Cir. 2020)
- United States v. Courtney Witherspoon (8th Cir. 2020)
- United States v. Rico Gilliam (8th Cir. 2019)
- United States v. Terry Thornton (8th Cir. 2019)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
William Shine received a 72-month prison sentence for being a felon in possession of a firearm. On appeal, he challenges the district court's 1 decision to treat his prior Missouri conviction of attempted first-degree robbery as a "crime of violence." 2 See U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(a)(4)(A). We affirm.
The Sentencing Guidelines establish a higher base offense level for a felon-in-possession who has a prior conviction for a "crime of violence."
Id.
A "crime of violence" includes, among other things, "any offense under federal or state law, punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year, that ... has as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against the person of another."
Id.
§ 4B1.2(a)(1). To determine whether an offense meets this definition, we look to the "elements of the offense as defined in the statute of conviction rather than to the facts underlying [the] prior conviction."
United States v. Fields
,
At the time of Shine's prior conviction, Missouri's first-degree-robbery statute provided as follows: "A person commits the crime of robbery in the first degree when he forcibly steals property and in the course thereof he, or another participant in the crime, [commits one of several aggravating factors]."
The offense qualifies as a "crime of violence." In addition to imposing a sentence "exceeding one year" in prison, U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(a), the first-degree-robbery statute required an individual to "forcibly steal[ ] property,"
It follows that first-degree robbery, which also has the element of "forcibly steal[ing] property,"
It makes no difference that Shine's conviction was for
attempted
first-degree robbery rather than the completed crime. His attempt was still punishable by more than one year in prison,
see
We affirm the district court's judgment.
The Honorable Greg Kays, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri.
Shine also argues that the government failed to introduce proof of his prior conviction. He waived this argument, however, when defense counsel withdrew her objection on this point after the government produced the underlying charging document from Shine's Missouri prosecution.
See
United States v. White
,
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.