David Pitlor v. T.D. Ameritrade
David Pitlor v. T.D. Ameritrade
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 18-2067 ___________________________
David Pitlor
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
T.D. Ameritrade; Kutak Rock LLP
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Nebraska - Omaha ____________
Submitted: January 22, 2019 Filed: January 28, 2019 [Unpublished] ____________
Before LOKEN, KELLY, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM.
David Pitlor appeals after the district court1 dismissed his action alleging federal and state law claims related to his online trading account. Upon careful
1 The Honorable John M. Gerrard, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Nebraska. review of the district court record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we find no basis for reversing the dismissal. See Kelly v. City of Omaha, 813 F.3d 1070, 1075 (8th Cir. 2016) (grant of motion to dismiss for failure to state claim under Rule 12(b)(6) is reviewed de novo). We also conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Pitlor’s post-judgment motion. Miller v. Baker Implement Co., 439 F.3d 407, 414 (8th Cir. 2006) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________
-2-
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished