United States v. Hassan Johnson

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

United States v. Hassan Johnson

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 17-3704 ___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v.

Hassan Lamont Johnson

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis ____________

Submitted: March 4, 2019 Filed: March 7, 2019 [Unpublished] ____________

Before LOKEN, COLLOTON, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM. Hassan Johnson directly appeals the sentence the district court1 imposed after he pleaded guilty to a firearm offense, pursuant to a plea agreement containing an appeal waiver. His counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

We will enforce the appeal waiver in this case because our review of the record demonstrates that Johnson entered into the plea agreement and the appeal waiver knowingly and voluntarily, his challenge to the sentence falls within the scope of the appeal waiver, and no miscarriage of justice would result from enforcing the waiver. See United States v. Andis, 333 F.3d 886, 889-92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc). Further, we have independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), and have found no non-frivolous issues for appeal outside the scope of the appeal waiver.

Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw and dismiss this appeal. ______________________________

1 The Honorable Audrey G. Fleissig, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.

-2-

Reference

Status
Unpublished