Frank Thunder Hawk-Gallardo v. Jeremy Wendling
Frank Thunder Hawk-Gallardo v. Jeremy Wendling
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 18-2637 ___________________________ Frank Thunder Hawk-Gallardo lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant v. Sergeant Jeremy Wendling lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of South Dakota - Sioux Falls ____________ Submitted: March 8, 2019 Filed: March 13, 2019 [Unpublished] ____________ Before ERICKSON, WOLLMAN, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM.
In this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, federal inmate Frank Thunder-Hawk Gallardo appeals following the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment. Upon de The Honorable Karen E. Schreier, United States District Judge for the District of South Dakota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Veronica L. Duffy, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of South Dakota. novo review, see Cullor v. Baldwin, 830 F.3d 830, 836 (8th Cir. 2016) (summary judgment standard of review); Moore v. Sims, 200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam) (standard of review for dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)), we find no merit to Gallardo’s arguments for reversal.2 The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________
The matters Gallardo raises for the first time in this court have not been considered. See Stone v. Harry, 364 F.3d 912, 914-15 (8th Cir. 2004) (declining to consider pro se appellant’s new allegations and arguments).
-2-
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.