Paul Miller v. AT&T
Paul Miller v. AT&T
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 18-2581 ___________________________
Paul F. Miller
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
AT&T, doing business as Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, also known as AT&T Arkansas; AT&T, doing business as DirecTV LLC
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees
JAMS
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant
RANDALLS
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas - Hot Springs ____________
Submitted: March 19, 2019 Filed: March 27, 2019 [Unpublished] ____________
Before ERICKSON, WOLLMAN, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM.
Paul Miller appeals the district court’s1 order confirming an arbitration award, and dismissing his application to vacate the award. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we conclude that the district court did not err in confirming the arbitration award. See Manion v. Nagin, 392 F.3d 294, 298 (8th Cir. 2004) (on appeal from order confirming arbitration award, factual findings are reviewed for clear error and questions of law are reviewed de novo). Accordingly, we affirm, see 8th Cir. R. 47B, and we deny the parties’ appellate motions. ______________________________
1 The Honorable Susan O. Hickey, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.
-2-
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished