Andrew Stephen Williams v. Minnesota Dept. of Corrections

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Andrew Stephen Williams v. Minnesota Dept. of Corrections

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 18-2037 ___________________________

Andrew Stephen Williams

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

Minnesota Department of Corrections; Tom Roy; Eddie Miles; Minnesota Correctional Facility-Faribault, Mailroom Department; Minnesota Correctional Facility-Faribault, Property Department; Rice County; City of Faribault; Washington County; City of Bayport; County of Dakota; City of Hastings

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis ____________

Submitted: May 1, 2019 Filed: May 6, 2019 [Unpublished] ____________

Before LOKEN, GRUENDER, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM. Andrew Williams appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his pro se complaint. Having carefully reviewed the record as to the claims Williams raises on appeal, and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we find no basis for reversal. See Plymouth Cty. v. Merscorp, Inc., 774 F.3d 1155, 1158 (8th Cir. 2014) (de novo review of Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) dismissal order). Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________

1 The Honorable Joan N. Ericksen, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Hildy Bowbeer, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.

-2-

Reference

Status
Unpublished