U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, 2019

Lennora Banks-Davis v. United States

Lennora Banks-Davis v. United States
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Decided May 23, 2019

Lennora Banks-Davis v. United States

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 18-2025 ___________________________ Lennora R. Banks-Davis, lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant, v. United States of America, lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee. ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis ____________ Submitted: May 20, 2019 Filed: May 23, 2019 [Unpublished] ____________ Before COLLOTON, BOWMAN, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM.

Federal inmate Lennora Banks-Davis appeals after the district court1 denied her relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We agree with the district court that Banks-Davis was not entitled to relief. In this proceeding, she could challenge only the execution of her sentence. She was required first to exhaust her administrative remedies, but she failed to do so. See Mathena v. United States, 577 F.3d 943, 946 (8th Cir. 2009); see also Abdullah v. Hedrick, 392 F.3d 957, 959 (8th Cir. 2004). We conclude, however, that the petition should have been dismissed without prejudice. See Mathena, 577 F.3d at 946. Accordingly, we modify the judgment to reflect that Banks-Davis’s section 2241 petition is dismissed without prejudice, see 28 U.S.C. § 2106, and we affirm the judgment as modified.

See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________

The Honorable Michael J. Davis, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Franklin L. Noel, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota, now retired.

-2-

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.