United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 18-3036 ___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v.

Lorenzo Soto-Zazueta

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota ____________

Submitted: June 18, 2019 Filed: July 2, 2019 [Unpublished] ____________

Before KELLY, BOWMAN, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM.

Lorenzo Soto-Zazueta directly appeals after he pled guilty to a drug offense, under a plea agreement containing an appeal waiver, and the district court1 sentenced

1 The Honorable Wilhelmina M. Wright, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota. him to a prison term below the calculated United States Sentencing Commission Guidelines Manual range. His counsel has moved to withdraw, and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), addressing enforcement of the plea waiver and reasonableness of the sentence.

Upon careful de novo review, we conclude the appeal waiver is valid, applicable, and enforceable. See United States v. Dallman, 886 F.3d 1277, 1280 (8th Cir. 2018) (“We review de novo issues concerning the interpretation and enforcement of a plea agreement and the application of appeal waivers.”); United States v. Andis, 333 F.3d 886, 889-92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (appeal waiver will be enforced if appeal falls within scope of waiver, defendant knowingly and voluntarily entered into plea agreement and waiver, and enforcing waiver would not result in miscarriage of justice). We have also independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), and have found no non-frivolous issues for appeal outside the scope of the appeal waiver. Accordingly, we enforce the appeal waiver, dismiss this appeal, and grant counsel leave to withdraw. ______________________________

-2-