United States v. Jason Konvalinka
United States v. Jason Konvalinka
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 19-1710 ___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Jason Lee Konvalinka
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Ft. Dodge ____________
Submitted: July 19, 2019 Filed: July 26, 2019 [Unpublished] ____________
Before LOKEN, GRUENDER, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM.
Jason Lee Konvalinka directly appeals the Guidelines-range sentence the district court1 imposed upon revoking his supervised release. Counsel seeks
1 The Honorable Leonard T. Strand, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa. permission to withdraw, and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging the sentence as substantively unreasonable.
After careful review of the record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in sentencing Konvalinka. See United States v. Miller, 557 F.3d 910, 915-18 (8th Cir. 2009) (standard of review). The record reflects that the district court properly considered the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors; there is no indication that it overlooked a relevant factor, or committed a clear error of judgment in weighing relevant factors, see United States v. Larison, 432 F.3d 921, 923-24 (8th Cir. 2006); and the sentence is within the Guidelines range, and below the statutory limit, see 18 U.S.C. §§ 3583(b)(2), (e)(3), (h).
Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and affirm the judgment. ______________________________
-2-
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished