Spencer Pierce v. Jerry Lovejoy

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Spencer Pierce v. Jerry Lovejoy

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 19-1087 ___________________________

Spencer Pierce

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

Jerry Lovejoy; Mike Roth; Rex Sparks; Securus Technology; John P. Sarcone; Matthew Towers; Trudy Simonson; Brad Youngblut; Gerald Fisher; Mark Paulson; John Doe; Lorna Garcia; James Entrekin; Michael McTaggart; Brady Carney

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Des Moines ____________

Submitted: November 6, 2019 Filed: November 13, 2019 [Unpublished] ____________

Before COLLOTON, SHEPHERD, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM. Spencer Pierce appeals three district court1 orders disposing of his pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Following a careful review, we conclude that the district court did not err in dismissing the case. See Plymouth Cty. v. Merscorp, Inc., 774 F.3d 1155, 1158 (8th Cir. 2014) (dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) is reviewed de novo); Johnson v. Blaukat, 453 F.3d 1108, 1112 (8th Cir. 2006) (grant of summary judgment is reviewed de novo). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________

1 The Honorable John A. Jarvey, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa.

-2-

Reference

Status
Unpublished