Harold Isaac v. Dana Cockrell
Harold Isaac v. Dana Cockrell
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 18-3190 ___________________________
Harold D. Isaac
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Unknown Flenoid
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant
Dana Cockrell; Paula Reed; Timothy Holsten
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees
Unknown Davis; Unknown Hannabrick
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - Cape Girardeau ____________
Submitted: December 4, 2019 Filed: December 12, 2019 [Unpublished] ____________
Before GRUENDER, WOLLMAN, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM. In this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, Missouri inmate Harold D. Isaac appeals following the district court’s1 adverse grants of summary judgment. Viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to Isaac, and giving him the benefit of all reasonable inferences, we find no basis for reversing the summary judgment orders, see Sisney v. Kaemingk, 886 F.3d 692, 697 (8th Cir. 2018) (de novo review); and we find no merit to Isaac’s challenges to certain other orders. The judgment is affirmed, see 8th Cir. R. 47B; and Isaac’s two pending motions are denied. ______________________________
1 The Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.
-2-
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished