William Ramsey v. Michelle Wingo
William Ramsey v. Michelle Wingo
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 19-1808 ___________________________
William Lewis Ramsey
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Michelle Wingo
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Helena ____________
Submitted: December 20, 2019 Filed: December 27, 2019 [Unpublished] ____________
Before LOKEN, SHEPHERD, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM. Federal inmate William Ramsey appeals the district court’s1 grant of summary judgment dismissing his Bivens claim against Michelle Wingo, a physician assistant at the Federal Correction Center in Forrest City, Arkansas. Upon de novo review, we agree that Ramsey failed to exhaust his administrative remedies before bringing suit, as 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) requires. See Porter v. Sturm, 781 F.3d 448, 451 (8th Cir. 2015) (standard of review). We further agree that the grievance process was not unavailable to Ramsey, and he offered no admissible evidence showing that prison officials prevented him from appealing. See id. at 452; 28 C.F.R. § 542.18.
The judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________
1 The Honorable D.P. Marshall Jr., Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the findings and recommendations of the Honorable Joe J. Volpe, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
-2-
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished