United States v. Trevor Ray
United States v. Trevor Ray
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 19-1377 ___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Trevor Scott Ray
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the District of South Dakota - Rapid City ____________
Submitted: December 23, 2019 Filed: December 30, 2019 [Unpublished] ____________
Before STRAS, WOLLMAN, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM.
Trevor Ray appeals the district court1 order denying his motion for a new trial and denying his requests for copies of documents. Our review of the record satisfies
1 The Honorable Jeffrey L. Viken, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of South Dakota. us that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion for a new trial. See United States v. Grover, 511 F.3d 779, 783 (8th Cir. 2007) (denial of motion for new trial based on newly discovered evidence is reviewed for abuse of discretion). We also find no basis for reversal of the district court’s ruling on Ray’s requests for documents. The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________
-2-
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished