Michael Sayen v. Gary Schurrer
Michael Sayen v. Gary Schurrer
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 19-2360 ___________________________ Michael S. Sayen lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant v. Gary R. Schurrer, in his individual capacity; John C. Hoffman, in his individual capacity; Thaddeus V. Jude lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota ____________ Submitted: January 22, 2020 Filed: January 30, 2020 [Unpublished] ____________ Before GRUENDER, BEAM, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM.
Michael Sayen appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. After careful review of the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we conclude that dismissal was proper. See Mireles v. Waco, 502 U.S. 9, 11- (1991) (per curiam) (discussing judicial immunity); see also Lance v. Dennis, 546 U.S. 459, 463 (2006) (lower federal courts are precluded from exercising appellate jurisdiction over final state court judgments). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________
The Honorable Nancy E. Brasel, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Hildy Bowbeer, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.
-2-
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.