Yoonjong Faubus v. Andrew Saul
Yoonjong Faubus v. Andrew Saul
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 19-2518 ___________________________
Yoonjong Faubus
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Andrew Saul, Commissioner, Social Security
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock ____________
Submitted: January 31, 2020 Filed: February 5, 2020 [Unpublished] ____________
Before GRUENDER, BEAM, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM. Yoonjong Faubus appeals a district court1 order affirming the denial of disability insurance benefits. We agree with the district court that Faubus received a full and fair administrative hearing. See Passmore v. Astrue, 533 F.3d 658, 663-64 (8th Cir. 2008) (reviewing de novo challenge to procedures of social security disability hearing). The judgment is affirmed. ______________________________
1 The Honorable Brian S. Miller, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable J. Thomas Ray, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
-2-
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished