United States v. Dustin Whitford
United States v. Dustin Whitford
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 19-3063 ___________________________ United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Dustin Michael Whitford Defendant - Appellant ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Cedar Rapids ____________ Submitted: February 3, 2020 Filed: February 6, 2020 [Unpublished] ____________ Before SHEPHERD, STRAS, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM.
Dustin Whitford appeals a within-Guidelines-range sentence of 12 months in prison for violating the conditions of supervised release. He challenges the substantive reasonableness of the sentence, and his attorney seeks permission to withdraw.
We conclude that Whitford’s sentence is substantively reasonable. See United States v. Miller, 557 F.3d 910, 917 (8th Cir. 2009) (reviewing the reasonableness of a revocation sentence for an abuse of discretion); United States v. Perkins, 526 F.3d 1107, 1110 (8th Cir. 2008) (stating that a within-Guidelines-range sentence is presumptively reasonable). The record establishes that the district court 1 sufficiently considered the statutory sentencing factors, 18 U.S.C. §§ 3553(a), 3583(e)(3), and did not rely on an improper factor or commit a clear error of judgment. See United States v. Larison, 432 F.3d 921, 923–24 (8th Cir. 2006). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment and grant counsel permission to withdraw. ______________________________
The Honorable C.J. Williams, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa. -2-
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.