Charles Foster v. Department of Army
Charles Foster v. Department of Army
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 19-1777 ___________________________
Charles A. Foster
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Department of Army
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock ____________
Submitted: February 4, 2020 Filed: February 12, 2020 [Unpublished] ____________
Before LOKEN, ERICKSON, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM.
Charles Foster appeals after the district court1 dismissed his employment discrimination action for failure to prosecute. Having carefully reviewed the record
1 The Honorable Brian S. Miller, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. and the arguments on appeal, we find no basis for reversal. See Burgs v. Sissel, 745 F.2d 526, 528 (8th Cir. 1984) (per curiam) (reviewing sua sponte dismissal for lack of prosecution for abuse of discretion); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________
-2-
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished