Charles Foster v. Department of Army

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Charles Foster v. Department of Army

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 19-1777 ___________________________

Charles A. Foster

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

Department of Army

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock ____________

Submitted: February 4, 2020 Filed: February 12, 2020 [Unpublished] ____________

Before LOKEN, ERICKSON, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM.

Charles Foster appeals after the district court1 dismissed his employment discrimination action for failure to prosecute. Having carefully reviewed the record

1 The Honorable Brian S. Miller, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. and the arguments on appeal, we find no basis for reversal. See Burgs v. Sissel, 745 F.2d 526, 528 (8th Cir. 1984) (per curiam) (reviewing sua sponte dismissal for lack of prosecution for abuse of discretion); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________

-2-

Reference

Status
Unpublished