Leticia Sanders v. Cleary Chapman
Leticia Sanders v. Cleary Chapman
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 18-2927 ___________________________
Leticia Sanders
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Cleary Chapman, Cpl., in his individual and official capacity as a Trooper for the Arkansas State Police (originally named as Chary Chapman); Erica Shelby, in her individual and official capacity as a Trooper for the Arkansas State Police
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock ____________
Submitted: March 10, 2020 Filed: March 13, 2020 [Unpublished] ____________
Before GRUENDER, BEAM, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM. Leticia Sanders appeals following the district court’s1 adverse entry of judgment on a jury verdict in her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Having carefully reviewed the parties’ submissions and the record before us on appeal, we conclude that Sanders’s claims are not susceptible to meaningful review because she failed to provide a transcript of the trial proceedings. See Fed. R. App. P. 10(b)(1) (discussing appellant’s duty to order transcript); Schmid v. United Bhd. of Carpenters & Joiners of Am., 827 F.2d 384, 385-86 (8th Cir. 1987) (per curiam) (where pro se appellant did not order trial transcript, appellate court could not review claims of evidentiary error, judicial bias, or insufficiency of evidence). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________
1 The Honorable James M. Moody Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
-2-
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished