United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 19-2348 ___________________________

Vincent A. Argentino

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

Corizon Medical Services

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant

Ruanne Stamps, Dr.; Narendrasinh Khengar, Dr.; Rex Hardman, Dr.

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees

Reuben Thacker, Dr.

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant

Glen Babbich, Dr.

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee

Dr. Thomas Kevin Bredeman, Regional Medical Director

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant

Amanda Verdot, Nurse; Samantha Lucas, Nurse; Hanna Wingate, Nurse; Matthew W. Pittman, Nurse

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees Cheryl Clad, Nurse; Patricia King, Nurse; Cheryl Galberth, Nurse

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants

Pamela Swartz, Nurse Practitioner

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee

Ashok Kumar Chada, Dr.

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Jefferson City ____________

Submitted: March 24, 2020 Filed: March 27, 2020 [Unpublished] ____________

Before GRUENDER, BEAM, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM.

In this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, Missouri inmate Vincent A. Argentino appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment. Construing the record in a light most favorable to Argentino, and drawing all inferences in his favor, we find that the grant of summary judgment to defendants was proper, see Cullor v. Baldwin, 830 F.3d 830, 836 (8th Cir. 2016) (de novo review); and we find no error in the

1 The Honorable Nanette K. Laughrey, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.

-2- district court orders denying Argentino’s various motions. The judgment is affirmed, see 8th Cir. R. 47B; and appellant’s motions for oral argument, and the parties’ motions for supplemental briefing, are denied. ______________________________

-3-