James Huntsman v. 3M Company
James Huntsman v. 3M Company
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 19-3081 ___________________________ James Richard Huntsman lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant v. 3M Company, a Delaware corporation; 3M Company Employee Retirement Income Plan; Zenith Annette Huntsman; Plan Administrator for the 3M Employee Retirement Income Plan lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota ____________ Submitted: June 1, 2020 Filed: June 4, 2020 [Unpublished] ____________ Before COLLOTON, BEAM, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM.
James Huntsman appeals after the district court1 dismissed his action asserting claims related to a series of Minnesota court orders modifying his spousal maintenance obligations. Upon careful review of the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we find no basis for reversal. See Newcombe v. United States, 933 F.3d 915, 917 (8th Cir. 2019) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________
The Honorable Paul A. Magnuson, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.
-2-
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.