Cadero King v. Andrew Saul

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Cadero King v. Andrew Saul

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 19-3438 ___________________________

Cadero King

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security Administration

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Nebraska - Omaha ____________

Submitted: June 9, 2020 Filed: June 12, 2020 [Unpublished] ____________

Before ERICKSON, WOLLMAN, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM.

Cadero King appeals the district court’s1 order affirming the denial of disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. Upon de novo review, we find

1 The Honorable John M. Gerrard, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Nebraska. no basis, and King offers none, for reversal. See Nash v. Comm’r Soc. Sec. Admin., 907 F.3d 1086, 1089 (8th Cir. 2018) (de novo review of district court’s judgment; upholding Commissioner’s decision if it is supported by substantial evidence on record as whole). The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.2 ______________________________

2 We agree with the district court that King’s filings reflect his misunderstanding of what is required for him to prove that he is disabled and entitled to benefits. Thus, like the district court, we suggest that King would be well advised to seek out an experienced representative to assist him if he intends to reapply for benefits.

-2-

Reference

Status
Unpublished