Cadero King v. Andrew Saul
Cadero King v. Andrew Saul
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 19-3438 ___________________________
Cadero King
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security Administration
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Nebraska - Omaha ____________
Submitted: June 9, 2020 Filed: June 12, 2020 [Unpublished] ____________
Before ERICKSON, WOLLMAN, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM.
Cadero King appeals the district court’s1 order affirming the denial of disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. Upon de novo review, we find
1 The Honorable John M. Gerrard, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Nebraska. no basis, and King offers none, for reversal. See Nash v. Comm’r Soc. Sec. Admin., 907 F.3d 1086, 1089 (8th Cir. 2018) (de novo review of district court’s judgment; upholding Commissioner’s decision if it is supported by substantial evidence on record as whole). The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.2 ______________________________
2 We agree with the district court that King’s filings reflect his misunderstanding of what is required for him to prove that he is disabled and entitled to benefits. Thus, like the district court, we suggest that King would be well advised to seek out an experienced representative to assist him if he intends to reapply for benefits.
-2-
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished