Deverick Scott v. Pamela Cook

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Deverick Scott v. Pamela Cook

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 20-1323 ___________________________

Deverick Scott

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

Pamela Cook, Sergeant, Varner Supermax

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Pine Bluff ____________

Submitted: August 12, 2020 Filed: August 17, 2020 [Unpublished] ____________

Before COLLOTON, WOLLMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM.

In this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, Arkansas inmate Deverick Scott appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment. Viewing the record in a light

1 The Honorable D. P. Marshall Jr., Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the most favorable to Scott, see Mbonyunkiza v. Beasley, 956 F.3d 1048, 1050 (8th Cir. 2020) (de novo review), we agree with the district court that because some evidence supported the disciplinary report Scott was issued, his First Amendment retaliation claim arising from that report failed, see Santiago v. Blair, 707 F.3d 984, 993 (8th Cir. 2013) (defendant may successfully defend against retaliatory discipline claim with some evidence that inmate actually violated prison rule). The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________

Honorable Jerome T. Kearney, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

-2-

Reference

Status
Unpublished