Arthur Clemens, Jr. v. Local One, SEIU
Arthur Clemens, Jr. v. Local One, SEIU
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 19-3554 ___________________________
Arthur J. Clemens, Jr.
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Local One Service Employees International Union; Tom Balanoff; Laura Garza; Nancy Cross
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis ____________
Submitted: August 19, 2020 Filed: August 24, 2020 [Unpublished] ____________
Before ERICKSON, STRAS, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM. In this action against the Local One, Service Employees International Union and its agents, Arthur Clemens appeals after the district court1 dismissed some of his claims, adversely granted summary judgment on his remaining claims, and denied his post-judgment motions. After careful review of the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we find no basis for reversal. See Zink v. Lombardi, 783 F.3d 1089, 1098 (8th Cir. 2015) (en banc) (per curiam) (dismissal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) is reviewed de novo); see also Banks v. John Deere & Co., 829 F.3d 661, 665 (8th Cir. 2016) (grant of summary judgment is reviewed de novo); IBEW, Local Union No. 545 v. Hope Elec. Corp., 293 F.3d 409, 415 (8th Cir. 2002) (denial of motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) is reviewed for abuse of discretion). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________
1 The Honorable Ronnie L. White, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.
-2-
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished