United States v. Jamal Lewis
United States v. Jamal Lewis
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 19-3039 ___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Jamal Lewis
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Springfield ____________
Submitted: October 21, 2020 Filed: October 28, 2020 [Unpublished] ____________
Before LOKEN, GRUENDER, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM.
Jamal Lewis, civilly committed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4246 since 2012, appeals the district court’s1 order revoking his most recent grant of conditional release.
1 The Honorable M. Douglas Harpool, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri, adopting the report and recommendations of the Because the district court did not clearly err in finding that Lewis failed to comply with his prescribed regimen of psychiatric care and that his continued release would therefore create a substantial risk of bodily injury to another person or serious damage to the property of another, see 18 U.S.C. § 4246(f), we affirm, see 8th Cir. R. 47B. See United States v. Burleson, 29 F. App’x 412, 413 (8th Cir. 2002) (per curiam) (standard of review). We also grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. ______________________________
Honorable David P. Rush, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Missouri.
-2-
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished