United States v. Jamal Lewis

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

United States v. Jamal Lewis

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 19-3039 ___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v.

Jamal Lewis

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Springfield ____________

Submitted: October 21, 2020 Filed: October 28, 2020 [Unpublished] ____________

Before LOKEN, GRUENDER, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM.

Jamal Lewis, civilly committed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4246 since 2012, appeals the district court’s1 order revoking his most recent grant of conditional release.

1 The Honorable M. Douglas Harpool, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri, adopting the report and recommendations of the Because the district court did not clearly err in finding that Lewis failed to comply with his prescribed regimen of psychiatric care and that his continued release would therefore create a substantial risk of bodily injury to another person or serious damage to the property of another, see 18 U.S.C. § 4246(f), we affirm, see 8th Cir. R. 47B. See United States v. Burleson, 29 F. App’x 412, 413 (8th Cir. 2002) (per curiam) (standard of review). We also grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. ______________________________

Honorable David P. Rush, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Missouri.

-2-

Reference

Status
Unpublished