Christopher McLees v. Andrew Saul
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 20-1828 ___________________________
Christopher McLees lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant v.
Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security Administration lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis ____________
Submitted: November 6, 2020 Filed: November 12, 2020
[Unpublished] ____________
Before ERICKSON, WOLLMAN, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.
____________ PER CURIAM.
Christopher McLees appeals the district court’s1 order affirming the Commissioner’s decision that he was overpaid disability insurance benefits and was not entitled to a waiver of recovery for the overpayment. We find that substantial evidence supports the administrative law judge’s decision that while McLees was not at fault for the overpayment, he did not meet his burden of proving that recovery would be against equity and good conscience or defeat the purpose of Title II. See Rodysill v. Colvin, 745 F.3d 947, 949 (8th Cir. 2014) (de novo review). The judgment is affirmed; and McLees’s motion to supplement the record is denied.2
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.